Wow, MW2 Is So messed up!

Im usually a Sniper, But where i live, its nearly impossible to Get 4 bar, And just the Other day, i Got commando'd through a Wall (SO MUCH LAGG!!!) Noobtubes and Glitches also ruin the game, And with so many people, Theres Lots of noobtubes. So for the Poll, What makes MW2 Bad, Or post a comment what is still Sane.

i didnt see the shotgun option

You know, If the Option isnt up there, Post why. It dosnt really Matter

The people who play it in general, if people didn't find these certain ways to play the game cheap, there wouldn't be much of a problem. Every game has its flaws, commando, bad servers, etc. but the people are the ones who would use those flaws to their advantage and ruin the game for others. The game is definitely not perfect, but it's not as bad as people think it is, it's the online interactions that ruin it. I believe if the game was campaign based and extended much further and the co-op added to this one, the game would have been less likely to have a failing following. Just my opinion anyways.

MADMike wrote:

The people who play it in general, if people didn't find these certain ways to play the game cheap, there wouldn't be much of a problem. Every game has its flaws, commando, bad servers, etc. but the people are the ones who would use those flaws to their advantage and ruin the game for others. The game is definitely not perfect, but it's not as bad as people think it is, it's the online interactions that ruin it. I believe if the game was campaign based and extended much further and the co-op added to this one, the game would have been less likely to have a failing following. Just my opinion anyways.

Yeah, Thats true. The Campaign was Pretty awesome, But wasnt worth the money for a 50 dollar game, so everyone is Playing online, But then again, its not there fault, Their just using what the game gives them, Its not there fault, its the games. Thats MY Opinion.

Zizzy626 wrote:

MADMike wrote:

The people who play it in general, if people didn't find these certain ways to play the game cheap, there wouldn't be much of a problem. Every game has its flaws, commando, bad servers, etc. but the people are the ones who would use those flaws to their advantage and ruin the game for others. The game is definitely not perfect, but it's not as bad as people think it is, it's the online interactions that ruin it. I believe if the game was campaign based and extended much further and the co-op added to this one, the game would have been less likely to have a failing following. Just my opinion anyways.

Yeah, Thats true. The Campaign was Pretty awesome, But wasnt worth the money for a 50 dollar game, so everyone is Playing online, But then again, its not there fault, Their just using what the game gives them, Its not there fault, its the games. Thats MY Opinion.

Much like you gave options above, their were options for the people. They weren't forced to use marathon, lightweight, commando, and a tac knife, or to glitch, or to abuse One Man Army, people who aren't skilled at the game or like to find the easy way out ruin a game. If a game sucked for your personal experience with single player or something AI based, then the game sucks, but when the game is abused and ruined by people who rather hack, glitch, or use the cheapest tactics possible, then it's their fault, not the game itself.

It's a game, and when it's taken as serious as many people have been taking it, it'll get bashed for it not being the way they want it to be. If the game truly sucked, no one would play it, including yourself and myself, but we all still play it because it, quite frankly, doesn't completely get ruined by the items listed above.

MADMike wrote:

Zizzy626 wrote:

MADMike wrote:

The people who play it in general, if people didn't find these certain ways to play the game cheap, there wouldn't be much of a problem. Every game has its flaws, commando, bad servers, etc. but the people are the ones who would use those flaws to their advantage and ruin the game for others. The game is definitely not perfect, but it's not as bad as people think it is, it's the online interactions that ruin it. I believe if the game was campaign based and extended much further and the co-op added to this one, the game would have been less likely to have a failing following. Just my opinion anyways.

Yeah, Thats true. The Campaign was Pretty awesome, But wasnt worth the money for a 50 dollar game, so everyone is Playing online, But then again, its not there fault, Their just using what the game gives them, Its not there fault, its the games. Thats MY Opinion.

Much like you gave options above, their were options for the people. They weren't forced to use marathon, lightweight, commando, and a tac knife, or to glitch, or to abuse One Man Army, people who aren't skilled at the game or like to find the easy way out ruin a game. If a game sucked for your personal experience with single player or something AI based, then the game sucks, but when the game is abused and ruined by people who rather hack, glitch, or use the cheapest tactics possible, then it's their fault, not the game itself.

It's a game, and when it's taken as serious as many people have been taking it, it'll get bashed for it not being the way they want it to be. If the game truly sucked, no one would play it, including yourself and myself, but we all still play it because it, quite frankly, doesn't completely get ruined by the items listed above.

Speaking Of MW2 Flaws, Im gonna Go Play it

noobs sorry wilzoe

I voted for EVERYTHING! because I think it's a combination. I would say that overall it is mostly the maps and the online interactions, like what MADMike said.

Nah MW2 just became interesting because of Paige lol

Bloodharbringer wrote:

Nah MW2 just became interesting because of Paige lol

''licks lips''
lol and wils little cuz joey 4 paige lol

Didn't see the "commando" option

gggfrt wrote:

Didn't see the "commando" option

i didnt see the gggfrt option.

Saint570 wrote:

gggfrt wrote:

Didn't see the "commando" option

i didnt see the gggfrt option.

lolwut?

gggfrt wrote:

Saint570 wrote:

gggfrt wrote:

Didn't see the "commando" option

i didnt see the gggfrt option.

lolwut?

what were iw thinking letting you play... tut tut iw. no triscuts for you.

Saint570 wrote:

gggfrt wrote:

Saint570 wrote:

gggfrt wrote:

Didn't see the "commando" option

i didnt see the gggfrt option.

lolwut?

what were iw thinking letting you play... tut tut iw. no triscuts for you.

lolsies