| Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR | |
|
+8Blink wilzoe superflydrew ~Legendary_DL~ CNicol11 keroberus2 ghillieman456 StrikerZX 12 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
StrikerZX 4-8Member
Posts : 168 Join date : 2009-10-07 Age : 28 Location : Las Vegas
| Subject: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:41 pm | |
| I love the intervention
it reminds me of the all so powerful
m40a3 and since it's the bolt action
it remind me even more of that gun
the barret 50 cal is ok
same power as the intervention but
less accurate and is semiautomatic
WA200 is ok along with the M21 EBR cuz they feel like the same gun
they need like two bullets for a kill and i like my bullets to exterminate
people in one bullet
cuz if not i'm screwed
So to rap it all up i love the Intervention
also, there is something about a bolt action rifle
that makes kills feel better
so yeah | |
|
| |
ghillieman456 New User
Posts : 13 Join date : 2009-07-14 Location : North Carolina
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:04 am | |
| Yes I have been realizing that all of these guns usually take 2 shots to take down an enemy. They really need to have more power on the barrett making it one shot kill along with the intervention. I miss the M40A3 from cod4 and I think they should have had a more assortment of sniper rifles. I personally use the barrett with heartbeat sensor and silencer along with a silenced glock with fmj. I just think that sniping it pointless on this game and people should stick to their assault rifles and SMGs. | |
|
| |
StrikerZX 4-8Member
Posts : 168 Join date : 2009-10-07 Age : 28 Location : Las Vegas
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:13 am | |
| - ghillieman456 wrote:
- Yes I have been realizing that all of these guns usually take 2 shots to take down an enemy. They really need to have more power on the barrett making it one shot kill along with the intervention. I miss the M40A3 from cod4 and I think they should have had a more assortment of sniper rifles. I personally use the barrett with heartbeat sensor and silencer along with a silenced glock with fmj. I just think that sniping it pointless on this game and people should stick to their assault rifles and SMGs.
WAT!!!!!!!! are you kidding me lol are you? but i have to disagree on sniping being pointless in this game the reason being is that you can enhance every art in sniping you enhance quickscopes with sleight of hand pro you enhance no scopes with steady aim you enhance hard scopes with steady aim pro you enhance power with stopping power you can also enhance bullet penetration with FMJ attachment so most of those take out sniping being pointless i have nothing against you dude but i disagree with your comment plus i don't really prefer heartbeat sensors cuz it takes my sight away from the real map i have myself focusing on that little sensor more so if someone has like ninja i'm screwed my sniper class is: Intervention FMJ dual deagles or when i get it dual model 1887 stopping power pro sleight of hand pro and steady aim pro with semtex and stun that class kill noobs and some pro players if your good if your really good you pwn elephants roflcopter | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: OMFG you all suck at snipzorzing. Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:29 am | |
| Accuracy stats count as recoil, RoF makes up for recoil and Intervention and Barrett both "One hit kill" WITHOUT Stopping Power, you just have to use the sniper how it was suppose to be used, sure no scopes and quick scopes are good for montages, clips, ETC...but other than that you hurt your team if you royally eff up which can happen against an AR IMO Barrett > Intervention. M21 > WA2000 BTW M21 has less recoil and if you are using sniper as a supportive roll headshots are 1 hit kills without stopping power on M21 and WA2000 the two best are the M21 and Barrett IMO but you BA fanbois love the Intervention. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:14 am | |
| i love the intervention thats the only sniper i use i hate people who use the barret or the m21 but m21 is ok for me anyways |
|
| |
StrikerZX 4-8Member
Posts : 168 Join date : 2009-10-07 Age : 28 Location : Las Vegas
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:06 am | |
| - zeldafan11 wrote:
- Accuracy stats count as recoil, RoF makes up for recoil and Intervention and Barrett both "One hit kill" WITHOUT Stopping Power, you just have to use the sniper how it was suppose to be used, sure no scopes and quick scopes are good for montages, clips, ETC...but other than that you hurt your team if you royally eff up which can happen against an AR
IMO Barrett > Intervention. M21 > WA2000
BTW M21 has less recoil and if you are using sniper as a supportive roll headshots are 1 hit kills without stopping power on M21 and WA2000 the two best are the M21 and Barrett IMO but you BA fanbois love the Intervention. if accuracy stats also count as recoil then the barret should be really accurate plus the way your supposed to use a sniper rifle is to kill the other person from longrange without stopping power you have to hit about the chest or higher no scopes aren't only for montages, clips, etc but they are also for people who are put in a situation where a person is right in front of you and you have no other choice but to shoot and a no scope and hope for the best quick scopes are also the same quick scopes you can't really follow people when they are near you when your scoped in, so you try to quickscope so you can hit him so it is much easier and also when your at a situation when someone know your at some place and you know he is there but you didn't kill him in the first shot you have to appear in a second and try to aim in that second and hit him so you have more of a chance to kill him and also you can't always have headshot with the wa200 or the m21 ebr though i also like them i am giving their bad sides as well the wa200 and the m21 have no recoil and are semiautomatic which is very usefull yet you have to mostly shoot them twice so i recommend those guns in hardcore and the intervention and the barret in normal health game modes plus you do help your team when you beast with those guns and i like the m21 more than the wa200 cuz you have with the wa200 you need to do that lens thing | |
|
| |
keroberus2 New User
Posts : 25 Join date : 2009-12-06 Age : 30 Location : England
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:12 pm | |
| Personally, whether the WA2k, Barret or Intervention are suprerior, I don't really care. To me, sniping does not feel right, if it's not a bolt action. (Goes back to the M40A3/R700 Days).
This means I will only use the Intervention, even if many a time, with stopping power it's still 2 hits. Sniping is instantly disadvantaged on this game, 2 hits are too frequent with the strongest snipers. Even with Stopping power, it's 2 hit many a time. I'd rather UMP across the map.
Intervention Thermal/Heartbeat ftw, or silencer on hardcore (Just because I can =D) | |
|
| |
CNicol11 4-8Member
Posts : 88 Join date : 2009-06-24 Age : 29 Location : Ballater, Scotland
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:20 pm | |
| I mostly use the Intervention because for some reason i'm really good at getting headshots so yeah... | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:49 pm | |
| - StrikerZX wrote:
- if accuracy stats also count as recoil then the barret should be really accurate
plus the way your supposed to use a sniper rifle is to kill the other person from longrange
without stopping power you have to hit about the chest or higher
no scopes aren't only for montages, clips, etc but they are also for
people who are put in a situation where a person is right in front of you
and you have no other choice but to shoot and a no scope and hope for the best
quick scopes are also the same
quick scopes you can't really follow people when they are near you when your scoped
in, so you try to quickscope so you can hit him so it is much easier
and also when your at a situation when someone know your at some place
and you know he is there but you didn't kill him in the first shot
you have to appear in a second and try to aim in that second and hit him
so you have more of a chance to kill him
and also you can't always have headshot with the wa200 or the m21 ebr
though i also like them i am giving their bad sides as well
the wa200 and the m21 have no recoil and are semiautomatic which is very usefull
yet you have to mostly shoot them twice
so i recommend those guns in hardcore
and the intervention and the barret in normal health game modes
plus you do help your team when you beast with those guns
and i like the m21 more than the wa200 cuz you have with the wa200
you need to do that lens thing That's what secondary's are for, when you move you pull out your secondary, no scopes and quick scopes are fine but using a secondary is a better tactic....And you are more likely to survive, helping your team if you don't "beast" it up, skilled snipers can get upper body and headshots you "beast"'s act like you get something for this when all you end up with is a negative K/D, aswell for all zZirGrizZ fanboys, anyone can no scope your not special, you would be helping your team more if you sniped as support, NOT rushing into spawn and dying after a no scope/quick scope(often a failed one). |
|
| |
~Legendary_DL~ New User
Posts : 15 Join date : 2009-12-06 Age : 33 Location : Dallas, Texas
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:01 pm | |
| i love all of the it just depends on weather im play a regular match or hardcore match.
reg. match Intervention, and 50 Cal.
HC match M21
i severly dislike the other one its pointless to use its just like the m21, so y is it there | |
|
| |
keroberus2 New User
Posts : 25 Join date : 2009-12-06 Age : 30 Location : England
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:13 pm | |
| - ~Legendary_DL~ wrote:
- i love all of the it just depends on weather im play a regular match or hardcore match.
reg. match Intervention, and 50 Cal.
HC match M21
i severly dislike the other one its pointless to use its just like the m21, so y is it there To look ugly. As my friends and I call it, it is the Box Sniper. | |
|
| |
StrikerZX 4-8Member
Posts : 168 Join date : 2009-10-07 Age : 28 Location : Las Vegas
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:01 pm | |
| - zeldafan11 wrote:
- StrikerZX wrote:
- if accuracy stats also count as recoil then the barret should be really accurate
plus the way your supposed to use a sniper rifle is to kill the other person from longrange
without stopping power you have to hit about the chest or higher
no scopes aren't only for montages, clips, etc but they are also for
people who are put in a situation where a person is right in front of you
and you have no other choice but to shoot and a no scope and hope for the best
quick scopes are also the same
quick scopes you can't really follow people when they are near you when your scoped
in, so you try to quickscope so you can hit him so it is much easier
and also when your at a situation when someone know your at some place
and you know he is there but you didn't kill him in the first shot
you have to appear in a second and try to aim in that second and hit him
so you have more of a chance to kill him
and also you can't always have headshot with the wa200 or the m21 ebr
though i also like them i am giving their bad sides as well
the wa200 and the m21 have no recoil and are semiautomatic which is very usefull
yet you have to mostly shoot them twice
so i recommend those guns in hardcore
and the intervention and the barret in normal health game modes
plus you do help your team when you beast with those guns
and i like the m21 more than the wa200 cuz you have with the wa200
you need to do that lens thing That's what secondary's are for, when you move you pull out your secondary, no scopes and quick scopes are fine but using a secondary is a better tactic....And you are more likely to survive, helping your team if you don't "beast" it up, skilled snipers can get upper body and headshots you "beast"'s act like you get something for this when all you end up with is a negative K/D, aswell for all zZirGrizZ fanboys, anyone can no scope your not special, you would be helping your team more if you sniped as support, NOT rushing into spawn and dying after a no scope/quick scope(often a failed one). I agree on switching to your secondary so that you don't die but what i was mostly talking about is the quickscopes you might have to do from long range if you need to do that even though a even better tactic is to run away and get him from a different angle But how about player who don't talk to their teammates even in team games They almost never help you at all i'm just asking everybody on which ones they like the best dude NO debate on how u play and you know i love you all I just love the intervention oh and sorry i talked back on your opinion really starting to lose my manners also if your good you can help your team with a sniper rifle without having to be support you can be like death_unites_us or me or elephant or anyone who is good at sniping You just have to learn everything about sniping and be good at it Having a negative K/d isn't bad it just tells you that you need to do better and good luck next time, then you will start to learn from your mistakes and be able to snipe as if you had and submachine or assault rifle Plus i don't really like zzirgrisaz lol no scoping is nothing special and requires luck which i don't have with no scoping | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:46 pm | |
| The Intervention is a beast of a weapon. but i feel that the gun is called by the map. in that sense, if im playing on a smaller map, ill rock the smg's. on a mid to close range map, ill rock the AR's. on maps like Wasteland, the sniper is the only answer. the long range firefights are ofter decided by the accuracy of the weapon. and the sniper rifle chosen by the player should match their playing type. The Intervention for more skilled players or people looking for an authentic feel or the semi-auto snipers for the person with a mediocre aim. In my opinion i feel that the Intervention is a better quick-scoping weapon, while the M21 EBR, the WA2000, and the .50 Cal are good weapons for the mid range maps, like Highrise.
But in the end, it is the personal preference of the player. |
|
| |
superflydrew New User
Posts : 13 Join date : 2009-12-02 Age : 29 Location : maryland
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:54 pm | |
| ill go with intervention plus: power, perfect with stoping power minus: time reloading, amount of ammo, iv leared to get passed reloading and ammo so intervention is my baby | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:55 pm | |
| - StrikerZX wrote:
- I agree on switching to your secondary so that you don't die but what i was mostly talking about is the quickscopes you might have to do from long range if you need to do that even though a even better tactic is to run away and get him from a different angle
But how about player who don't talk to their teammates even in team games
They almost never help you at all
i'm just asking everybody on which ones they like the best dude
NO debate on how u play
and you know i love you all
I just love the intervention
oh and sorry i talked back on your opinion
really starting to lose my manners
also if your good you can help your team with a sniper rifle without having to be support
you can be like death_unites_us or me or elephant or anyone who is good at sniping
You just have to learn everything about sniping and be good at it
Having a negative K/d isn't bad it just tells you that you need to do better and
good luck next time, then you will start to learn from your mistakes and be able
to snipe as if you had and submachine or assault rifle
Plus i don't really like zzirgrisaz lol
no scoping is nothing special and requires luck which i don't have with no scoping That is how I play and yes there are moments where you need to quick scope like when they sneak up on you while sniping, even today that I needed to quick scope when someone sneaked up on me using the Intervention quite I was quick scoping WITHOUT Stopping Power and got a lot of kills quick scoping aggressively and then I played a match with the same setup but I supported my team and my score was greater in size, though I learned in my trials, that quick scoping takes a lot of skill but so does normal sniping, all preference. Well I like Barret and M21 EBR, though it's sad they didn't make the WA2000 fully auto like it is in real life, oh well... |
|
| |
StrikerZX 4-8Member
Posts : 168 Join date : 2009-10-07 Age : 28 Location : Las Vegas
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:08 am | |
| If the Wa2000 was fully automatic it would be overpowered no increasingly overpowered like model 1887 akimbos | |
|
| |
wilzoe 4-8Fan
Posts : 1593 Join date : 2009-09-14 Age : 27 Location : ~4-8 Died on Me
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:57 pm | |
| barret is the best has high damage and is auto-matic | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:19 am | |
| I'm not "pro" at sniping so i like the security that if i miss i wont have to worry about a delay before the next shot. Sometimes ill miss and the enemy figures out where i am then by the time they have time to react my second shot has already blown their face off. But I have to admit. The intervention is pretty sweet |
|
| |
Blink 4-8Member
Posts : 316 Join date : 2009-06-15
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:22 am | |
| I don't have a favorite because I have the Cheytac as my sniper rifle class but I like to use the default sniper rifle class that the game provides.
That takes me to one point, Cheytac sounds so much better than Intervention. When I hear Intervention, I think about intermission. | |
|
| |
gggfrt "gg"
Posts : 1768 Join date : 2009-12-17 Age : 29 Location : New Mexico
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:41 pm | |
| all i have to say is intervention. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Sun May 09, 2010 10:54 am | |
| i personally love the m21 i use it with fmg and acog with stopping power its a one shot kill every time |
|
| |
Saint570 "AKA Screen Name"
Posts : 3403 Join date : 2009-08-29 Age : 27 Location : 4-8Forums
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Sun May 09, 2010 10:56 am | |
| - k-colts1977 wrote:
- i personally love the m21 i use it with fmg and acog with stopping power its a one shot kill every time
meh the barret is stronger and semi-auto so i prefer it. and welcome! we have an introduction so if you want to you cant tell us abit bout yourself there. if you want to that is. have fun and trust me you'll have fun here. | |
|
| |
death_unites_us The Founder of 4-8
Posts : 4218 Join date : 2009-06-13 Age : 31 Location : Ohio
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Sun May 09, 2010 12:06 pm | |
| - k-colts1977 wrote:
- i personally love the m21 i use it with fmg and acog with stopping power its a one shot kill every time
Welcome new member k-colts! | |
|
| |
Dempentseka 4-8Member
Posts : 40 Join date : 2010-01-08 Age : 32 Location : Belgium
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR Mon May 10, 2010 3:02 pm | |
| Intervention, seems like its the only rifle that shoots where i want it to, if that makes sense. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR | |
| |
|
| |
| Intervention vs Barret. 50 Cal. vs WA200 vs. M21 EBR | |
|